SJ Refugee

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: when is sj back??? #1117495
    SJ Refugee
    Participant

      When they pay their leccy bill.

      in reply to: when is sj back??? #1138160
      SJ Refugee
      Participant

        When they pay their leccy bill.

        in reply to: Another baby girl #1135389
        SJ Refugee
        Participant
          Irie wrote:
          Kids are so loving aren’t they… bless the 4 of you, enjoy :group_hug .

          Five. There are 5 of them now.

          in reply to: Another baby girl #1115032
          SJ Refugee
          Participant
            Irie wrote:
            Kids are so loving aren’t they… bless the 4 of you, enjoy :group_hug .

            Five. There are 5 of them now.

            in reply to: Are there too many sections to Partyvibe #1137636
            SJ Refugee
            Participant
              L K wrote:
              I thought SJ only had a few people, but fuck me.

              Really?

              I’ve found it’s one of the busiest forums I’ve ever used.

              Most are closer to PV in post rate.

              in reply to: Are there too many sections to Partyvibe #1116977
              SJ Refugee
              Participant
                L K wrote:
                I thought SJ only had a few people, but fuck me.

                Really?

                I’ve found it’s one of the busiest forums I’ve ever used.

                Most are closer to PV in post rate.

                in reply to: Man banned from talking to women in public #1117116
                SJ Refugee
                Participant
                  BioTech wrote:
                  Must have been humiliating for the victims and it definitely shouldn’t be right that people can go around doing that but banning him from talking to women for 5 years!? Surely that’s a bit extreme and will lead to resentment/hate.

                  He’s not banned from talking to woem for 5 years.

                  Quote:
                  The father-of-two from Swindon is forbidden from approaching any woman he does not know in the open air, unless for legitimate reasons.

                  He can talk to whoever he wants, he just has to have a legitimate reason, ie. not just to grab their arse.

                  in reply to: Man banned from talking to women in public #1137777
                  SJ Refugee
                  Participant
                    BioTech wrote:
                    Must have been humiliating for the victims and it definitely shouldn’t be right that people can go around doing that but banning him from talking to women for 5 years!? Surely that’s a bit extreme and will lead to resentment/hate.

                    He’s not banned from talking to woem for 5 years.

                    Quote:
                    The father-of-two from Swindon is forbidden from approaching any woman he does not know in the open air, unless for legitimate reasons.

                    He can talk to whoever he wants, he just has to have a legitimate reason, ie. not just to grab their arse.

                    in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1117061
                    SJ Refugee
                    Participant
                      april wrote:
                      you can see it too,..:weee: CooL

                      Is that a child’s arse in your avatar April?

                      in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1137722
                      SJ Refugee
                      Participant
                        april wrote:
                        you can see it too,..:weee: CooL

                        Is that a child’s arse in your avatar April?

                        in reply to: Pornography #1137589
                        SJ Refugee
                        Participant
                          gravy wrote:
                          dunno some porn is great, but there’s a serious hypocritical thing going on in our society when people like langham are swung from the rafters when you can go in to a sex shop and buy “schoolgirl lolita sex fiends take it up the pooper XVI”

                          So it’s alright for him to have pictures of young children getting raped, because people like the idea of fucking teens?

                          in reply to: Pornography #1116930
                          SJ Refugee
                          Participant
                            gravy wrote:
                            dunno some porn is great, but there’s a serious hypocritical thing going on in our society when people like langham are swung from the rafters when you can go in to a sex shop and buy “schoolgirl lolita sex fiends take it up the pooper XVI”

                            So it’s alright for him to have pictures of young children getting raped, because people like the idea of fucking teens?

                            in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1117060
                            SJ Refugee
                            Participant
                              april wrote:
                              ….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …

                              AND THEY WERE BOTH NONSES!

                              I can see a pattern forming…

                              in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1137721
                              SJ Refugee
                              Participant
                                april wrote:
                                ….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …

                                AND THEY WERE BOTH NONSES!

                                I can see a pattern forming…

                              Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)